Description: 100ft contours derived from the 2016 LIDAR flown over the valley and Logan/Blacksmith Fork Canyons. The DEMs from the state were combined using GDAL into one GeoTiff that was then smoothed using mdenoise with values of n=50, t=0.60, and v=50. 5ft contours were created with gdal_contour in EPSG:3560 and then reprojected into a feature dataset with a projection that matches the rest of the county's data. The 100ft contours were subsetted from the original 5ft contours.
Copyright Text: Data: Utah AGRC. Processing: GDAL and custom smoothing script by Jake Adams
Description: 40ft contours derived from the 2016 LIDAR flown over the valley and Logan/Blacksmith Fork Canyons. The DEMs from the state were combined using GDAL into one GeoTiff that was then smoothed using mdenoise with values of n=50, t=0.60, and v=50. 5ft contours were created with gdal_contour in EPSG:3560 and then reprojected into a feature dataset with a projection that matches the rest of the county's data. The 40ft contours were subsetted from the original 5ft contours.
Copyright Text: Data: Utah AGRC. Processing: GDAL and custom smoothing script by Jake Adams
Description: 20ft contours derived from the 2016 LIDAR flown over the valley and Logan/Blacksmith Fork Canyons. The DEMs from the state were combined using GDAL into one GeoTiff that was then smoothed using mdenoise with values of n=50, t=0.60, and v=50. 5ft contours were created with gdal_contour in EPSG:3560 and then reprojected into a feature dataset with a projection that matches the rest of the county's data. The 20ft contours were subsetted from the original 5ft contours.
Copyright Text: Data: Utah AGRC. Processing: GDAL and custom smoothing script by Jake Adams
Description: 5ft contours derived from the 2016 LIDAR flown over the valley and Logan/Blacksmith Fork Canyons. The DEMs from the state were combined using GDAL into one GeoTiff that was then smoothed using mdenoise with values of n=50, t=0.60, and v=50. Contours were created with gdal_contour in EPSG:3560 and then reprojected into a feature dataset with a projection that matches the rest of the county's data.
Copyright Text: Data: Utah AGRC. Processing: GDAL and custom smoothing script by Jake Adams
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.company_id
(
type: esriFieldTypeInteger, alias: Company ID
)
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.area_served
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Area Served, length: 255
)
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.source
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Water Source, length: 255
)
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.max_cfs
(
type: esriFieldTypeInteger, alias: Max CFS
)
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.canal_type
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Canal Type, length: 255
, Coded Values:
[Main: Main canal alignment]
, [Lateral: Side canal delivering water to customers]
, [Abandoned: Abandoned or re-routed canal, often due to pressurization]
, ...5 more...
)
giscanal.sde.Alignments_Canal_New.flow_direction
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Flow Direction, length: 100
, Coded Values:
[with_digitized: Flow is same direction as digitization]
, [against_digitized: Flow is opposite direction as digitization]
)
Description: This layer represents annexation areas that cities have indicated through there individual policies they want to annex. Data is digitized as cities update their future annexation area maps, and make Cache county is made aware of the change. There are cities we have been unable to find any annexation future plans for.
Copyright Text: Cities within Cache County
Cache County Planning and Zoning
Cache County GIS Department